When new evidence may support audit reconsideration
Identify information not previously considered and the status of the assessment.
Read the guideBuild an evidence index connecting each disputed issue to its source records. An unexplained stack of receipts makes review harder; retain originals and submit copies through the instructed process.
The IRS Independent Office of Appeals handles qualifying disputes under specific procedures. Read the decision or notice to determine the issues, request requirements and timing. An administrative appeal, a collection hearing and a court petition are different processes. Preserve copies of what was submitted and when. If a deadline is approaching or the next forum is unclear, seek qualified help without assuming that an informal discussion extends the response period.
For this question, assemble: Examination letter, issue list, indexed records.
Review the records for the correct taxpayer or entity, form, year and period. Similar amounts can belong to different years or different kinds of tax. Keep a dated note of any correction requested from a payer, employer, bank or preparer. When responding formally, follow the document instructions and retain the exact submission, attachments and evidence of transmission so later follow-up concerns the same information.
IRS taxpayer rights include being informed, paying only the correct amount, challenging an IRS position, seeking applicable independent review, privacy and retaining representation. These rights help organize questions and requests for a clear explanation. They do not guarantee a particular relief result or remove procedural requirements. Keep the notice, supporting evidence and a dated communication record so the unresolved issue and requested next step can be described accurately.
Preserve the original notice and return even when later evidence changes the calculation. Add a dated explanation of what was discovered, when it was obtained and how it affects the issue. That history can matter when choosing between a notice response, reconsideration or another review route. It also makes a professional handoff more useful than a folder containing only the latest revised spreadsheet.
Use the official source links to check the procedure again immediately before acting. Rules, fees, forms and program descriptions can change, and a general explanation cannot resolve facts that are missing from the file. If professional help is appropriate, provide the same organized summary used for your own review and ask for a written scope covering the actual tax years, issue and approaching deadline.
No. The notice, issue and stage determine the available route. Read the specific instructions and do not substitute a general website timeline for the actual deadline.
No. Rights protect fair process and other specified interests. The facts, applicable law, eligibility requirements and deadlines still determine how a request is considered.
Rules and procedures can change. Check the current source and seek qualified advice for your own facts.
Use the referral line to make an inquiry. Ask who will provide the service, what it costs, and which options apply to your situation.
Promoted referral contact. No outcome or eligibility is guaranteed.